NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Truong v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2023] NSWCA 64 Hearing dates: 17 March 2023 Date of orders: 12 April 2023 Decision date: 12 April 2023 Before: Ward P at [1]; Brereton JA at [104]; Griffiths AJA at [105] Decision: 1. Refuse leave for the extension of time for the filing of the applicant's summons seeking judicial review. 2. Summons dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeal and review – Judicial review of decision of District Court dismissing appeal from conviction in the Local Court – where applicant convicted in the Local Court of the offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm – whether the summons for judicial review was out of time by four and a half years – where the applicant was unrepresented and assisted by a Mackenzie friend – where applicant raised a complaint as to falsification of evidence – where applicant raised complaints in relation to an initial charge of grievous bodily harm, alleged malicious prosecution and asserted the applicant was refused leave to issue a subpoena – where jurisdictional error not established Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 11(1), 18, 19, 20(1)(b) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 33, 59(1) District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 51.16(2), 59.10(1), 59.10(3) Cases Cited: Bangura v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2020] NSWCA 138 Barrett v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2020] NSWCA 270 Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd (2013) 252 CLR 38; [2013] HCA 7 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52 Garde v Dowd (2011) 80 NSWLR 620; [2011] NSWCA 115 Insurance Australia Group trading as NRMA Insurance v Keen [2021] NSWCA 287 Jamal v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2019] NSWCA 121 Lunney v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2021) 105 NSWLR 236; [2021] NSWCA 186 McNab v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2021) 106 NSWLR 430; [2021] NSWCA 298 Ming v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2022] NSWCA 209 Nabi v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2022] NSWCA 92 Oakey Coal Action Alliance Inc v New Acland Coal Ply Ltd (2021) 272 CLR 33; [2021] HCA 2 Quinn v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (2021) 106 NSWLR 154; [2021] NSWCA 294 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 6 Singh v Hicks and Nissan [2021] NSWCA 80 Stanley v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2021) 107 NSWLR 1; [2021] NSWCA 337 Stanley v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2023] HCA 3 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) (2007) 71 NSWLR 61; [2007] NSWCA 369 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bach Cong Truong (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: BC Truong (Applicant – self represented) CO Gleeson (First Respondent) Submitting appearance (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate