NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Strotz v NSW Trains [2023] NSWIRComm 1029 Hearing dates: 11 April 2023 Date of orders: 13 April 2023 Decision date: 13 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Industrial Court of NSW Before: Commissioner Sloan Decision: The Application is dismissed Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW – Workers compensation legislation – application for reinstatement of injured worker – whether applicant fit for employment of the kind for which she had applied Legislation Cited: Workers Compensation Act 1987 ss 240, 241, 242, 243, 245 Cases Cited: Cansino v South Western Sydney Area Health Service (1999) 130 IR 1; [1999] NSWIRComm 355 Hamod v State of New South Wales and Anor [2011] NSWCA 375 Potter v Industrial Relations Secretary in respect of the Department of Regional New South Wales (No 2) [2023] NSWIRComm 1026 Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales (on behalf of Peter Riley) v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWIRComm 108 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Judith Strotz (Applicant) NSW Trains (Respondent) Representation: J Strotz (Self-represented) Counsel: S Meehan (Respondent) Solicitors: Maddocks (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00140935 Publication restriction: No
DECISION 1. Judith Strotz has applied to the Commission for an order, pursuant to s 242 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 ("Act"), that she be reinstated to her position as a Passenger Services Supervisor with NSW Trains ("Application"). 2. I have determined to dismiss the Application. My reasons follow.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate