NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Poulos v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2023] NSWSC 362 Hearing dates: 11 April 2023 Date of orders: 11 April 2023 Decision date: 11 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Ball J Decision: (1) The proceedings be dismissed; (2) Should the Plaintiff seek to file any further application in this Court against the Defendant in respect of the matters raised in the Amended Statement of Claim filed 1 November 2022, the Plaintiff must at the same time file a document of no more than five pages showing cause why this Court should not in chambers summarily dismiss the application as vexatious and an abuse of process; and (3) The Plaintiff pay the cost of the Defendant's Amended Notice of Motion dated 11 April 2023. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS — Amending, varying and setting aside — Fraud, misrepresentation or suppressions of material fact — Where no basis for Application — Where application restates matters addressed in impugned judgment CIVIL PROCEDURE — Summary disposal — Dismissal of proceedings — Frivolous or vexatious proceedings CIVIL PROCEDURE — Parties — Leave to institute proceedings — Frivolous or vexatious proceedings Cases Cited: Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Hacide Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Sully J, 28 November 1989, unrep) Elders Lensworth Finance Limited v Glenwood Investments Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Needham J, 8 December 1988, unrep) Hacide Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1991] NSWCA 134 Poulos v Elliott [2019] NSWSC 423 Poulos v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2021] NSWSC 971 Poulos v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1620 Poulos v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group [2022] NSWCA 218 Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd [2019] NSWCA 241 Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 290 Poulos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWCA 72 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Patricia Poulos (Plaintiff) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Litigant in Person (Plaintiff) M Hall (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate