NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Mehajer [2023] NSWDC 98 Hearing dates: 27 March 2023 – 31 March 2023, 03 April 2023 & 05 April 2023 Date of orders: 05 April 2023 Decision date: 05 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: (1) The application for the stay of these proceedings until the accused is able to arrange representation by a legal practitioner for the conduct of the trial is refused (2) The proceedings are adjourned to Wednesday 12th April 2023 for commencement of the trial Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Dietrich application – accused charged with domestic violence offences – application to recuse – accused's health – accused's expenses –– exceptional circumstances warranting the trial to continue without legal representation – accused's onus not discharged – stay refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Cases Cited: Craig v South Australia [1994/1995] 184 CLR 163 Cranston v R [2020] NSWCCA 143 Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 292 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Gaudie v Local Court (NSW) [2013] NSWSC 1425; (2013) 235 A Crim R 98 Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] 1 WLR 2416 McIver v R [2020] NSWCCA 343 R v Cranston [2020] NSWSC 469 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Salim Mehajer (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ken Gilson (Crown Prosecutor) Salim Mehajer (Self-represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate