NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bayliss v R [2023] NSWCCA 84 Hearing dates: 12 April 2023 Decision date: 19 April 2023 Before: Adamson JA at [1]; McNaughton J at [79]; Sweeney J at [80] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction — Supply of firearm — whether verdict was unreasonable — whether open to jury to be satisfied of gun supply beyond reasonable doubt — whether verdict was inconsistent with finding of not guilty on additional count for separate firearm — evidence of single witness in relation to both counts — whether evidence unreliable — whether it was open to jury to make different findings on each count Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 32, 38 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), s 51 Cases Cited: AS v R [2022] NSWCCA 291 Bridger v R [2022] NSWCCA 125 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 Nguyen v R [2017] NSWCCA 145 R v ACK [2000] NSWCCA 180 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jacob Blake Bayliss (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) D Scully (Respondent)
Solicitors: Ross Hill & Associate Solicitors (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/321618 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 24 November 2020 (verdict of jury) Before: Hamill J File Number(s): 2017/321618
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate