NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The University of Sydney v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 383 Hearing dates: 13 April 2023 Date of orders: 18 April 2023 Decision date: 18 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Leave to amend Technology and Construction List Statement refused; leave granted to plaintiff to circulate further proposed amended List Statement Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Technology and Construction List – application to amend Technology and Construction List Statement – claim under s 37 of the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 – proposed contentions concerning whether sixth defendant had engaged in construction work COSTS – costs assessment – procedure – meaning of "costs thrown away" – utility of abstract consideration of that term – whether confined to past costs – meaning of "costs of and occasioned by amendment" Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Edelman v Badower [2010] VSC 427 Salmon v Albarran (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 114 The Owners – Strata Plan No 84674 v Pafburn Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 659 The Owners – Strata Plan No 93543 v Zhang (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 360 Ziliotto v Dr Hakim (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1079 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The University of Sydney (Plaintiff/Applicant) Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (First Defendant/First Respondent) Brookfield Australia Investments Limited (Second Defendant/Second Respondent) Francis-Jones Morehen Group Pty Ltd (Third Defendant/Third Respondent) Surface Design Consulting Pty Ltd as trustee for the Surface Unit Trust (ACN 142 970 545) (Fourth Defendant/Fourth Respondent) Arup Pty Limited (Fifth Defendant/Fifth Respondent) McKenzie Group Consulting (NSW) Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant/Sixth Respondent) Chevalier (Aluminium Engineering) Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 19 099 118 331) (Seventh Defendant/Seventh Respondent) Building Studio Architects Pty Ltd (ABN 72 123 331 402) (Eighth Defendant/Eighth Respondent) Building Certificates Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 45 105 050 897) (Ninth Defendant/Ninth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Shipway (Plaintiff/Applicant) A Carr (First and Second Defendants/First and Second Respondents) M Sheldon (Third Defendant/Third Respondent) A Toogood (solicitor) (Fourth Defendant/Fourth Respondent) J I Whealing (Fifth Defendant/Fifth Respondent) D S Weinberger (Sixth Defendant/Sixth Respondent) R James (solicitor) (Seventh Defendant/Seventh Respondent) K Bowles (solicitor) (Eighth Defendant/Eighth Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate