NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Miles v R [2023] NSWCCA 90 Hearing dates: 27 February 2023 Date of orders: 27 February 2023 Decision date: 21 April 2023 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL McNaughton J R A Hulme AJ Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal and allow the appeal. (2) Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court on 3 December 2021 and in lieu impose an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 3 years and 3 months with a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months. (3) The sentence is to date from 11 November 2020. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeals against sentence –use offensive weapon with intent to commit indictable offence in company – reckless wounding in company – assault – drive whilst disqualified – mistake of fact in assessment of objective gravity – failure of legal representatives to present subjective case causing miscarriage of justice where there was evidence of disadvantaged background and mental ill-health – errors conceded by Crown – appeal allowed – appellant re-sentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33B, 35 and 61 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 23 and 44 Criminal Procedure Act 1985 (NSW), s 166 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW), s 54 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Momoa v R [2020] NSWCCA 328 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Nauer v R [2020] NSWCCA 174 Newman v R [2019] NSWCCA 157 Rae v R [2019] NSWCCA 284 Rizk v R [2020] NSWCCA 291 Tsiakas v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Scott Raymond Miles (Appellant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Roy (Appellant) M Millward (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate