NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ceerose Pty Ltd v A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 401 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 20 April 2023 Decision date: 20 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Darke J Decision: Orders made for adjudication determinations to be set aside in part, and confirmed in part. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) ("the Act") – adjudication determinations – where adjudication determinations are affected by jurisdictional error – where the Court has the power to set aside the whole or any part of an adjudication determination pursuant to s 32A of the Act – meaning and operation of s 32A of the Act – consideration of how adjudicated amounts which are affected by jurisdictional error may be reduced pursuant to s 32A of the Act – consideration of the extent to which the Court may or should exercise its power pursuant to s 32A of the Act in relation to the reasons for an adjudication determination – consideration of whether determinations of liability for adjudicator's fees are affected by jurisdictional error Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 3, ss 22, 29(3), 32A Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Amendment Act 2018 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ceerose Pty Ltd v A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 239 Ceerose Pty Ltd v A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 345 Grosvenor Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited (in administration) v Musico [2004] NSWSC 344 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Council, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 24 October 2018 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Ceerose Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) A-Civil Aust Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) John Tuhtan (Second Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) ABC Dispute Resolution Service (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Robertson SC with Mr D Hume (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Mr F Hicks SC with Mr L Gor (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate