NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat; Yesilhat v Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos (No. 6) [2023] NSWSC 415 Hearing dates: 5 October, 6 December 2022 and thereafter in chambers. Date of orders: 28 April 2023 Decision date: 02 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Order the second defendant to pay the plaintiff the sum of $16,837.48 as a specified gross sum instead of assessed costs. Order the plaintiff to pay the second defendant the sum of $40,000 as a specified gross sum instead of assessed costs. Judgment for the second defendant in the sum of $23,162.52. Catchwords: COSTS – costs assessment – specified gross sum costs order – Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) – protracted legal proceedings between the plaintiff estate and three defendants – the proceedings now continue only as between the plaintiff and the second defendant – the first defendant is bankrupt and the third defendant, a company, is in liquidation – general costs orders have been made in the second defendant's favour against the plaintiff estate – particular costs orders have been made in favour of the plaintiff estate against the second defendant – whether the evidence advanced on behalf of the second defendant is sufficient to allow s 98(4)(c) orders to be made – what specified gross sum orders should be made instead of assessed costs in favour of each of the plaintiff and the second defendant – whether any gross sums fixed should be set-off against one another. Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 3(1), 98(4)(c) Legal Profession Uniform Law 2015, reg 72 Cases Cited: Bechara (t/as Bechara and Company) v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294 Burrows v Macpherson & Kelley Lawyers (Sydney) Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 148 Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat, Yesilhat v Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos [2017] NSWSC 666 Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat; Yesilhat v Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos (No. 2) [2019] NSWSC 584 Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat; Yesilhat v Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos (No. 3) [2019] NSWSC 1752 Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat; Yesilhat v Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos (No. 4) [2020] NSWSC 1044 Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat; Yesilhat v Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos (No. 5) [2021] NSWSC 1586 Ellingsen & Anor v Det Skandinaviske Compani & Ors [1919] 2 KB 567 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 King Network Group Pty Ltd v Club of the Clubs Pty Limited (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 204 Korner v H. Korner & Co. Ltd [1951] Ch 10 Riva NSW Pty Limited v Mark A Fraser; Fraser v Riva (NSW) (No. 4) [2022] NSWSC 1624 Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2021] NSWCA 110 Category: Consequential orders Parties: 2013/358168 Plaintiff: Cleopatra Sclavos Calokerinos, as executor of the estate of the late George Sclavos First Defendant: Okan Yesilhat Second Defendant: Gokan Yesilhat Third Defendant: Australia's Best Tyres & Auto Pty Ltd ACN 151 629 131
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate