NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Targeted Property Investments Pty Ltd v Look Up Technologies Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 416 Hearing dates: 5 April 2023 Date of orders: 21 April 2023 Decision date: 21 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Griffiths AJ Decision: (1) The applicant have leave to appeal. (2) The appeal be dismissed. (3) The appellant pay the respondent's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: RETAIL LEASES ACT – Retail tenancy dispute –Whether relevant premises are a "retail shop" – Whether relevant lease is a "retail shop lease" –Appeal under s 83(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – Whether the NCAT has jurisdiction over dispute – Claim of "no evidence" for findings of fact Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales v X (2000) 49 NSWLR 653; [2000] NSWCA 199 Avetmiss Easy Pty Ltd v Australian Skills Qualifications Authority [2014] FCA 314 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Be Financial Pty Ltd as Trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Da Costa v The Queen (1968) 118 CLR 186; [1968] HCA 51 Davis v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2016] NSWCA 325; (2016) 18 BPR 36,459 Dee-Tech Pty Ltd v Neddam Holdings Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 251; (2012) 16 BPR 31,089 Diamond Certification Laboratories Pty Ltd v The Trust Company Ltd [2015] NSWCATCD 122 Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCA 378; (2014) 96 ATR 875 Gedeon v Commissioner of the New South Wales Crime Commission (2008) 236 CLR 120; [2008] HCA 43 Grygiel v Baine [2005] NSWCA 218 Hanave Pty Ltd v Nomad Sydney Pty Ltd (formerly Wine Nomad Pty Ltd) [2023] NSWSC 265 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation (2015) 233 FCR 315; [2015] FCAFC 92 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 390; [2010] HCA 32 Look Up Technologies PL v Targeted Property Investments PL (NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Senior Member Burton SC, 29 June 2022, unrep) Manly Council v Malouf t/as Fusion Point (2004) 61 NSWLR 394; [2004] NSWCA 299 May v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission (2015) 233 FCR 397; [2015] FCAFC 93 Moweno Pty Ltd v Stratis Promotions Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 1151; (2002) 11 BPR 20,565 Moweno Pty Ltd v Stratis Promotions Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 376 Orr v Cobar Management Pty Ltd (2020) 103 NSWLR 36; [2020] NSWCCA 220 Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice (No 2) (2010) 241 CLR 320; [2010] HCA 24 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 R v JS [2007] NSWCCA 272; (2007) 175 A Crim R 108 Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd v Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 223 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 Targeted Property Investments Pty Ltd v Look Up Technologies Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 318 Targeted Property Investments Pty Ltd v Look Up Technologies Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1465 Thomaz and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2023] NSWCA 40 Waterford v The Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54; [1987] HCA 25 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Targeted Property Investments Pty Ltd (Applicant) Look Up Technologies Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Fernon SC with JP Nathan (Applicant) P Finch (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate