NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nastav v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATOD 209 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 31 July 2018 Decision date: 31 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R Titterton, Principal Member Decision: (1) A hearing is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW).
(2) The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs on the indemnity basis in the sum of $21,334.00. Catchwords: Costs – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: 203 Castlereagh Street Pty Limited v Skybloo Holdings Pty Limited [2017] NSWCATAP 29 Abughazaleh v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force; Sydney Training Academy Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 30 Ahmed v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATOD 113 Brodyn Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation – Strata Plan 73019 (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAP 224 Degmam Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Wright (No 2) [1983] 2 NSWLR 354 Mendonca v Tonna [2017] NSWCATAP 176 Nastav v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATOD 71 Obieta v Australian College of Professionals Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 38 Category: Costs Parties: Stephen Nastav (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Self-represented (Applicant) Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00345507 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64(1) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the name of the person referred to as CXA in these reasons is not to be published.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate