NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wieckowski v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATOD 190 Hearing dates: 30 November 2016 and 22 March 2017 Date of orders: 3 May 2017 Decision date: 03 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: N S Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: 1 The decision to refuse to grant Mr Wieckowski's application for an operator licence under the Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 is set aside.
2 In substitution, order that the Commissioner issue an operator licence under the Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 to Mr Wieckowski Catchwords: MERITS REVIEW – tattoo parlour – operator licence – fit and proper person – public interest - additional grounds for refusing an application - Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Firearms Act 1996 Security Industry Act 1997 Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Tattoo Parlours Regulation 2013 Cases Cited: Deakin v Commissioner for Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAD 2. Dyas v Director-General, Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2014] NSWCATAD 223 Roads and Maritime Services v Rifahi [2015] NSWCATAP 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Michael Wieckowski (Applicant)
Commissioner for Fair Trading, Department of Finance, Services and Innovation (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Wieckowski and R Taylor-Notley, agent, appearing by leave (Applicant) M Kumar (the Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate