NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stiles v Commissioner for Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2016] NSWCATOD 170 Hearing dates: 23 September 2015 Date of orders: 16 February 2016 Decision date: 16 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The decision is affirmed Catchwords: tattooist licence - fit and proper person - close associate - public interest Legislation Cited: Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Civil And Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Security Industry Act 1997 Cases Cited: Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading + Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 244 AVS Group Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2012] NSWADT 1 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (GD) [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Dyas v Director-General Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2014] NSWCATAD 223 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No. 2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Smith v Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force & NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Zahra v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force & NSW Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 211 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gleness Stiles (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L Robison (Applicant) C Mantziaris (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate