NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Patsantzopoulos by his tutor Naumov v Burrows [2023] NSWCA 79 Hearing dates: 17 April 2023 Decision date: 26 April 2023 Before: Ward P at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Adamson JA at [46] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Direct the applicant within 7 days to file a notice of appeal in accordance with the draft notice of appeal, and otherwise dispense with the rules as to service. 3. Appeal dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – permanent stay – action for damages for historical sexual assault more than 30 years ago – defendant suffered severe stroke in 2014 and now suffers from dementia – defendant prosecuted for same conduct – defendant found unfit to stand trial – following special hearing, defendant found on limited evidence to have committed offence against plaintiff pursuant to s 22(1)(c) of Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) – whether defendant's inability to provide instructions and cognitive decline made a fair trial impossible – whether primary judge failed to address substantive submission advanced by defendant – significance of defendant being confronted with allegations before his cognitive decline – significance of being unfit to stand trial on criminal charges and application for permanent stay of civil proceedings – discretion to grant a permanent stay re-exercised but appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 6E(1), 578A Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 91, 92 Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1984 (NSW), s 4 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1944 (NSW), s 2 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s 6A Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), s 22 Cases Cited: BRJ v The Corporate Trustees of The Diocese of Grafton [2022] NSWSC 1077 Burrows v Patsantzopoulos [2022] NSWDC 442 Chalmers v Leslie [2020] QSC 343 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Moubarak by his tutor Coorey v Holt (2019) 100 NSWLR 218; [2019] NSWCA 102 The Council of Trinity Grammar School v Anderson (2019) 101 NSWLR 762; [2019] NSWCA 292 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dimitrios Patsantzopoulos by his tutor Anastasia Naumov (Applicant) Lauren Burrows (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J Davis (Applicant) C T Barry KC with R Royle (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate