NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Finlay v Cox [2023] NSWSC 400 Hearing dates: 19 & 24 April 2023 Date of orders: 26 April 2023 Decision date: 26 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: No order as to costs made to the intent that each of the plaintiff and the first defendant will bear his and her own costs of the proceedings between them. Catchwords: COSTS – exercise of costs discretion – plaintiff brings proceedings against multiple defendants but no longer wishes to proceed against the first defendant – the plaintiff and first defendant cannot agree upon what costs order should be made to conclude the proceedings – whether each of the plaintiff and the first defendant has acted reasonably in commencing and defending the proceedings respectively – whether one party was almost certain to have succeeded if the matter had been fully tried. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) Conveyancing Act 1919, s 26(1) Cases Cited: Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 194 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Peter Leslie Finlay First Defendant: Robina Victoria Cox Second Defendant: Roger David Cox Third Defendant: Heath Joseph Cox Fourth Defendant: Hayley Elizabeth Cox Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: M. White SC
Solicitors: Plaintiff: A.R. Martin, Martin Legal First Defendant: R.J.B. Allsop, Allsop Glover Lawyers Second, Third & Fourth Defendants: C. Leahy, Leahy Lawyers File Number(s): 2022/275997 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate