NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O'Donnell v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATOD 171 Hearing dates: 15 February 2016 Date of orders: 26 July 2016 Decision date: 26 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J McAteer, Senior Member Decision: (1) The decision to refuse the applicant's application for a tattooist licence is set aside.
(2) The applicant's application for a tattooist licence is granted.
(3) Pursuant to section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the publication of paragraphs 27-38 (inclusive) of this decision (except to the second respondent) is prohibited. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Administrative review jurisdiction – Tattoo parlour licence – Fit and proper person – confidential evidence - Public interest. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 Security Industry Act 1997 Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 Cases Cited: Smith v Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force and Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 187 Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 244. AJO v Director-General Department of Transport [2012] NSWADT 101 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brock O'Donnell (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H El-Hage (First and Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate