NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zhang v R [2023] NSWCCA 98 Hearing dates: 25 November 2022 Date of orders: 25 November 2022 Decision date: 28 April 2023 Before: Davies J at [1]; Ierace J at [2]; R A Hulme AJ at [75] Decision: Reasons for order made on 25 November 2022: (1) Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Interlocutory appeal – Application for leave to appeal two interlocutory decisions pursuant to s 5F(3)(a) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – Where trial judge refused applications to adjourn trial and recuse himself for apprehended and actual bias – Whether refusal of adjournment application infected by House v The King error –Whether recusal decision amenable to s 5F appeal Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), ss 69, 74 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), s 135.4(3) Cases Cited: Barakat v Goritsas [2012] NSWCA 8 Chamoun v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2018] NSWCCA 182 Dietrich v The Queen (1999) 177 CLR 292; [1992] HCA 57 Gurung v R [2012] NSWCCA 201 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 R v Alexandroaia (1995) 81 A Crim R 286 R v Rogerson (1990) 45 A Crim R 253 R v Zhang [2020] NSWSC 478 Zhang v R [2021] NSWCCA 266 Zhang v R [2022] NSWCCA 100 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Li Zhang (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) K Ginges (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate