NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mehajer v R [2023] NSWCCA 101 Hearing dates: 17 April 2023 Date of orders: 17 April 2023 Decision date: 17 April 2023 Before: Davies J; Ierace J; Cavanagh J Decision: Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: APPEALS — application for leave to appeal – appeal against exercise of discretion – where trial judge refused an application to stay proceedings – whether applicant is indigent – whether applicant is incapable of conducting his trial as a self-represented person Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 37(1), 59(1), 61 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13(1) Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 (NSW), ss 25(4)(l), 60 Cases Cited: Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; [1992] HCA 57 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 R v BK (2000) 110 A Crim R 298 R v Cranston [2020] NSWSC 469 R v Cranston (No 8) [2021] NSWSC 9 R v Cox [1999] NSWCCA 229 R v Macdonald (No 4) [2016] NSWSC 486 R v Mehajer [2018] NSWSC 1687 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Salim Mehajer (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Mehajer (Applicant) Mr G Newton SC with Mr K Gilson (Respondent)
Solicitors: Mr S Mehajer (Applicant) NSW Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/16899 Publication restriction: Non-publication order over the identity of the complainant in the trial.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate