NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Lauren Cranston [2023] NSWSC 454 Hearing dates: 28 April 2023 Date of orders: 1 May 2023 Decision date: 01 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Payne JA Decision: (1) Ms Cranston is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 4 years to commence on 14 March 2023 and expire on 13 March 2027 for the tax fraud conspiracy; (2) Ms Cranston is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 6 years to commence on 14 March 2025 and expire on 13 March 2031 for the money laundering conspiracy; (3) Under s 19AB of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) a single non-parole period of 5 years is fixed; (4) The offender is first eligible for parole on 13 March 2028. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – federal offenders – conspiracy to cause loss to the Commonwealth – money laundering conspiracy – significant loss to the Commonwealth – persistent course of conduct Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) sch 1, Criminal Code Cases Cited: Alpha v The Queen [2013] NSWCCA 292 Arenilla-Cepeda v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 267 Bar-Mordecai v Rotman [2000] NSWCA 123 Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 67 Dickson v R (No 18) [2015] NSWSC 286 Dickson v R [2016] NSWCCA 105 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie [2017] NSWCCA 301; 270 A Crim R 556 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Gregory (2011) 34 VR 1; [2011] VSCA 145 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 DPP (Cth) v Estrada (2015) 45 VR 286; [2015] VSCA 22 Elomar v The Queen (2014) 316 ALR 206; [2014] NSWCCA 303 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Ha v R [2008] NSWCCA 141 Hili v R; Jones v R (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Leach v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 1; [2007] HCA 3 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Ngo v R [2018] NSWCCA 296 O'Neil-Shaw v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 42 Pearce v R (1988) 194 CLR 610 R v Agius; R v Zerafa [2012] NSWSC 978; 87 ATR 528 R v Anquetil [2020] NSWSC 995 R v Glynatsis [2013] NSWCCA 131; (2013) 230 A Crim R 99 R v Gregory (2011) 34 VR 1; [2011] VSCA 145 R v Hammond [2020] NSWSC 888 R v Huang; R v Siu [2007] NSWCCA 259; 174 A Crim R 370 R v Huston; R v Fox; R v Henke; ex parte Cth DPP [2011] QCA 350; 219 A Crim R 209 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v Issakidis [2018] NSWSC 378 R v Jiao [2015] NSWCCA 95; 251 A Crim R 236 R v Kitson [2019] NSWSC 1109 R v Lin [2014] NSWCCA 254 R v Nguyen [2010] NSWCCA 331 R v Pilley (1991) 56 A Crim R 202 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 R v Want [2013] NSWCCA 2 Sabra v R [2015] NSWCCA 38 Savvas v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 1 Shi v R [2014] NSWCCA 276; 246 A Crim R 273 Strbak v The Queen (2020) 267 CLR 494; [2020] HCA 10 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Totaan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247; (2007) 173 A Crim R 458 Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629; [2003] HCA 14 Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown) Lauren Anne Cranston (Offender) Representation: Counsel: P McGuire SC with J Paingakulam and C Tran (Crown) TD Anderson SC (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate