NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rouse Hill Custodian Corporation Pty Ltd v Prisma Rouse Hill Development Pty Ltd [2023] NSWLEC 48 Hearing dates: 6, 7, 8 July 2022, 12, 19, 20 December 2022, further written submissions 11 January 2023, 10, 21, 28 February 2023 Decision date: 02 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Pain J Decision: See below in [394]-[403] Catchwords: EASEMENT – grant of development consent by court for medium density residential development with stormwater to drain under public road to neighbouring private land – variation from approved development in volume of stormwater to be discharged – s 40(1)(a) applies despite need to vary development consent – exercise of discretion to find joinder of relevant parties not necessary – easement in pipe under public road does benefit applicant's land - easement reasonably necessary for use of applicant's land for medium density residential development – use of land not inconsistent with the public interest – appropriate compensation can be paid to servient tenement – exercise of discretion to make an easement with some variation of terms Legislation Cited: Blacktown City Council Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Plan 2010 (NSW), Sch 4 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 70, 70A, 88, 88A, 88K Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 40 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), s 59A Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Roads Act 1993 (NSW), ss 71, 85, 94, 97, 138, 139, 139A, 142, 145, 146, 149 State Environmental Planning Policy (Precincts – Central River City) 2021 (NSW), cl 1.4, Appendix 8 State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 (NSW), Appendix 6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021 (NSW), cl 5.8 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 6.23, 6.24 Cases Cited: 117 York Street Pty Ltd v Proprietors of Strata Plan 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504; (1998) 98 LGERA 171 Alramon Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2022] NSWLEC 108 Arrow v Electricity Commission of NSW (1994) 87 LGERA 363 A.T.B. Morton Pty Ltd v Community Association DP270447 (No 2) [2018] NSWLEC 87 Becton Corporation Pty Ltd v Minister for Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources [2005] NSWLEC 197 Besmaw Pty Ltd v Sydney Water Corporation (2001) 113 LGERA 246; [2001] NSWLEC 15 Billgate Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2004) 136 LGERA 356 [2004] NSWLEC 436; Boland v Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd (1999) 74 ALJR 209 Bonnici v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (2001) 121 LGERA 1; [2001] NSWSC 1124 Bonvale Enterprises Pty Ltd v Halfpenny Investments Pty Ltd (2005) 62 NSWLR 698; [2005] NSWSC 219 Bropho v Western Australia (1990) 171 CLR 1; [1990] HCA 24 Casuarina Rec Club Pty Limited v The Owners - Strata Plan 77971 (2011) 80 NSWLR 711; [2011] NSWCA 159 Celesteem Rouse Hill Development v Blacktown City Council [2020] NSWLEC 1137 City of Canterbury v Saad (2013) 195 LGERA 329; [2013] NSWCA 251 Community Association DP270447 v ATB Morton Pty Ltd (2019) 240 LGERA 32; [2019] NSWCA 87 Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 297 Dewhirst v Edwards [1983] 1 NSWLR 34 Diro Group Pty Ltd v Leuzinger [2021] NSWLEC 107 Electricity Commission of NSW v Arrow (1994) 85 LGERA 418 Hamilton v Joyce [1984] 3 NSWLR 279 Huntington & Macgillivray v Hurstville City Council (No 2) (2005) 139 LGERA 84 Katakouzinos v Roufir Pty Ltd (1999) 9 BPR 17,303; [1999] NSWSC 1045 Khattar v Wiese (2005) 12 BPR 23235; [2005] NSWSC 1014 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd (2012) BPR 31257; [2012] NSWCA 445 Nicole-Anne Hickey v The Owners Strata Plan 78825 [2022] NSWLEC 135 North Shore Gas Co Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1940) 63 CLR 52; [1940] HCA 7 Olefines Pty Ltd v Valuer-General (NSW) [2018] NSWCA 265 Potter v Minahan [1908] HCA 63; 7 CLR 277 Pugh v Savage [1970] 2 QB 373 Rainbowforce Pty Ltd v Skyton Holdings Pty Ltd (2010) 171 LGERA 286 ; [2010] NSWLEC 2 Re Maiorana and the Conveyancing Act (1970) 92 WN (NSW) 365 Registrar-General of New South Wales v Jea Holdings (Aust) Pty Ltd (2015) 88 NSWLR 321; [2015] NSWCA 74 Rixon v Horseshoe Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1293 Roden v Bandora Holdings Pty Limited [2015] NSWLEC 191 Ross v Lane Cove Council (2014) 86 NSWLR 34; [2014] NSWCA 50 Rudd v Hornsby Shire Council (1975) 31 LGRA 120 Shi v ABI-K Pty Ltd (2014) 87 NSWLR 568; [2014] NSWCA 293 Spencer v Commonwealth (1907) 5 CLR 418 Sydney City Council v Claude Neon Limited (1989) 15 NSWLR 724 Sydney City Council v Ipoh Pty Limited (2006) 68 NSWLR 411; [2006] NSWCA 300 Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd v Page (2021) 393 ALR 485; [2021] NSWCA 204 Stow v Mineral Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd (1979) 180 CLR 295; [1979] HCA 30 Terry Rd Development Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1226 The Queen v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd (1982) 158 CLR 327; [1982] HCA 69 Todrick v Western National Omnibus Co Ltd [1934] CH 561 Tomasic v Port Stephens Council [2021] NSWLEC 56 Tregoyd Gardens Pty Limited v Jervis (1997) 8 BPR 15845 Trevlind v BMP Manufacturing [2008] NSWSC 603 Willoughby City Council v Roads and Maritime Services (2014) 201 LGERA 177; [2014] NSWLEC 6 Woodland v Manly Municipal Council (2003) 127 LGERA 120; [2003] NSWSC 392 Texts Cited: Dennis Pearce, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (9th ed, 2019, LexisNexis Butterworths) New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) 10 October 1995 at 1494 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rouse Hill Custodian Corporation Pty Ltd (Applicant) Prisma Rouse Hill Development Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Tomasetti SC with T Poisel (Applicant) I Hemmings SC with C Koikas (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate