NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Moisidis v The Council of the City of Sydney [2023] NSWLEC 1218 Hearing dates: 6 and 7 February 2023 Date of orders: 09 May 2023 Decision date: 09 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pullinger AC Decision: In relation to proceedings 2022/88816 (the Development Application appeal), the Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The exhibits, other than 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, U and V, are returned. In relation to proceedings 2022/88827 (the Building Information Certificate appeal), the Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The exhibits, other than 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, U and V, are returned. In relation to proceedings 2022/115594 (the Development Control Order appeal), the Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The exhibits, other than 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, U and V, are returned. Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – APPEAL – building information certificate – APPEAL – development control order – unauthorised building work – dwelling house – alterations and additions – heritage conservation – heritage conservation area – design excellence – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 1.3, 4.15, 8.7, 8.18, 8.25, Div 9.3, Sch 5 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 17 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 2.2, 4.3, 4.6, 5.10, 6.21, Sch 5, Pt 2 Cases Cited: Madss Properties No 2 Pty Ltd ATF Newtown Property Trust (No 2) v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 126 Toga Penrith Developments Pty Limited v Penrith City Council [2022] NSWLEC 117 Texts Cited: Australian Building Codes Board, 2019 National Construction Code Volume 2, Building Code of Australia, 2019 Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 ICOMOS, The Burra Charter: the Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, 2013 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Elias Moisidis (Applicant) The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T March (Applicant) P Canning (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate