NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Niguidula (No 5) [2023] NSWSC 500 Hearing dates: 11 May 2023 Date of orders: 11 May 2023 Decision date: 11 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Dhanji J Decision: The Crown is entitled to tender the still shot from the CCTV footage apparently showing the accused at the immigration desk in the Arrivals Hall at Sydney International Airport on 10 November 2019. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – criminal proceedings – where defence propose to make a number of admissions – whether Crown can lead further evidence as to a fact that has been admitted by the accused – blanket ruling sought – blanket ruling overruled – example fact – Crown seeking to rely on photograph in addition to bare fact admitted – photograph gives additional layer of meaning to bare fact – Crown entitled to tender photograph Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 135, 137, 184, 191 Cases Cited: Stubley v The State of Western Australia (2011) 242 CLR 374; [2011] HCA 7 R v JGW [1999] NSWCCA 116 R v Smith [1981] 1 NSWLR 193 R v Frazer [2002] 128 A Crim R 89; [2002] NSWCCA 59 R v Brooks [2017] NSWSC 188 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Jenny Niguidula (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Taylor (Crown) A Boe (Accused)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Murphy's Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2019/390005; 2019/365704 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate