NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (ACN 105 235 363) [2023] NSWSC 503 Hearing dates: 24, 26, 27, 28 April and 5 May 2023, with further written submissions received on 5 and 11 May 2023 Date of orders: 15 May 2023 Decision date: 15 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Williams J Decision: See orders at paragraph [355]. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – vexatious proceedings orders Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 58, 64, 91 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 480, 482(1), 482(3), 488(2), 530C, sch 2 s 90-15(1) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 91 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) s 4 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) s 5 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) ss 42, 43, 74MA Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 67 Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) s 63 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) ss 4, 6(a), 6(b), 6(c), 6(d), 7, 8(1), 8(2)(a), 8(2)(c), 8(3), 8(4), 8(7)(a), 8(7)(b) Cases Cited: Andy Vuong Duc Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Limited (Supreme Court of New South Wales, 30 May 2022, unrep) Attorney-General v Tareq Altaranesi [2013] NSWSC 63 Bathis-Brown v Woods [2015] NSWSC 1194 CBRE (V) Pty Limited v Trilogy Funds Management Limited (2021) 107 NSWLR 202; [2021] NSWCA 316 Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd v Pham (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 185 In the matter of Beechworth Land Estates Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and Griffith Estates Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2018] NSWSC 1703 In the matter of ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liq) [2022] NSWSC 919 In the matter of ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (Costs) [2023] NSWSC 162 In the matter of ENA Development Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 54 In the matter of ENA Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) [2022] NSWSC 1478 In the matter of Raejoe Pty Limited (receiver and manager appointed) (administrators appointed) as trustee for "The Coe Family Trust" [2012] NSWSC 1457 In the matter of Spartan Pastoral Company Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2020] NSWSC 1218 Jemmott v ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liq) (Receiver Appointed) [2022] FCA 1134 Metcash Ltd v Jardim (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 1042 Mohareb v Palmer (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 324 O'Neill v Kwon [2016] NSWSC 1706 Official Trustee v Bankruptcy v Gargan (No 2) [2009] FCA 398 One T Development Pty Ltd v Peter Krejci (Court of Appeal (NSW), 20 February 2023, unrep) Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 446 Potier v Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales (2015) 89 NSWLR 284; (2015) 53 Fam LR 308; [2015] NSWCA 129 Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] NSWCA 267 Ronald Jemmott v ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (Supreme Court of New South Wales, 6 January 2023, unrep) Ronald Jemmott v Peter Krejci in his capacity as liquidator of ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (Federal Court of Australia, 8 February 2023, unrep) Sebie v ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (Receiver Appointed), in the matter of ENA Development Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 2 Sebie v Pham (No 3) [2021] NSWCA 277 Teoh v Hunters Hill Council (No 8) [2014] NSWCA 125 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507; (2015) 89 ALJR 750; (2015) 323 ALR 1; (2015) 254 IR 371; [2015] HCA 28 Toronto (City) v C.U.P.E Local 79 [2003] 3 SCR 77; [2003] SCJ No 64; 232 DLR (4th) 385; 9 Admin LR (4th) 161; 2003 SCC 63 UBS AG v Tyne as Trustee of the Argot Trust (2018) 265 CLR 77; (2018) 92 ALJR 968; (2018) 360 ALR 184; [2018] HCA 45 Viavattene v Attorney-General (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 44 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited [2018] NSWCA 317 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Krejci in his capacity as liquidator of ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (ACN 105 235 363) (First Plaintiff) ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (ACN 105 235 363) (Second Plaintiff) Robert Sebie (First Defendant) Ronald Jemmott (Second Defendant) One T Development Pty Ltd (ACN 632 081 853) (Third Defendant) Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd (ACN 169 428 988) (Fourth Defendant) Enterprise INT Pty Ltd (ACN 604 743 740) (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M L Rose (Plaintiffs)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate