NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mills v Walsh (Costs) [2023] NSWCA 97 Hearing dates: On the papers; written submissions closed 9 February 2023 Date of orders: 16 May 2023 Decision date: 16 May 2023 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; White JA at [2]; Brereton JA at [19] Decision: (1) Vary order (2) made on 8 December 2022 to read as follows: "(2) Order that the appellant and the second respondent pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal up to and including 6 September 2022 and that the appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal thereafter." Catchwords: COSTS – Party/Party – Proceedings discontinued or dismissed – Court's discretion – Proceedings discontinued by one appellant – Where discontinuing appellant by her conduct ratified conduct of solicitors in filing an appeal in her name – Whether fair and reasonable to otherwise order discontinuing appellant not jointly and severally liable for costs up to date of discontinuance – No basis to displace usual order as to costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.19, 51.56 Cases Cited: Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 32 Fordyce v Fordham (2006) 67 NSWLR 497; [2006] NSWCA 274 Category: Costs Parties: David Mills (Appellant) Haiden Walsh (First Respondent) Crystal Zhang (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
H Woods (Appellant) N Kabilafkas (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate