NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Richards v R [2023] NSWCCA 107 Hearing dates: 10 May 2023 Decision date: 19 May 2023 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL [1]; Adamson JA at [11]; Price J at [121] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Historical sex offences — whether sentencing judge took adequate account of delay CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence —finding of special circumstances — applicant previously sentenced for historical sex offences - principle of totality — whether total term of continuous imprisonment excessive and parole period inadequate — whether sentencing judge erred by failing to backdate commencement of sentence — alleged manifest excess CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — whether sentencing judge erred in finding evidence of post-offence good character of little weight CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — distinction between lack of further convictions and finding that offending behaviour ceased Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A(5A), 25AA, 44(2B), 47(2)(a) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61D(1), 61E(1), 61E(1A), 80, 81, 81A Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 JL v R [2023] NSWCCA 99 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; (2014) 246 A Crim R 528 Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Lonsdale v R [2020] NSWCCA 267 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 Neal v The Queen (1982) 149 CLR 305; [1982] HCA 55 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Dennis (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 14 December 1992, unrep) R v Knight [2005] NSWCCA 241; (2005) 155 A Crim R 252 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Nightingale [2005] NSWCCA 147 R v Obbens [2022] NSWCCA 109 R v Spiers [2008] NSWCCA 107 R v Todd [1982] NSWLR 517 Ryan v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 267; [2001] HCA 21 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Wakefield v R [2010] NSWCCA 12 Wu v R [2011] NSWCCA 102; 211 A Crim R 88 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Desmond Richards (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P F Tehan KC / P Skinner (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate