NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: King River Digital Assets Opportunities SPC v Salerno [2023] NSWSC 510 Hearing dates: 29 March 2023 Date of orders: 16 May 2023 Decision date: 16 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Rees J Decision: Proceedings stayed. Catchwords: COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION — plaintiff is customer of digital asset trading company — arbitration agreement between customer and company — customer entrusts US$20.4m to company — company goes into administration — customer sues company director for accessorial liability for misleading and deceptive conduct of company — director will defend claim on basis that company did not engage in such conduct — director initially seeks transfer and security for costs – director becomes aware of ability to seek stay — s2 Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW) — whether a person claiming "through or under" party to the arbitration agreement — director taking stand on same ground as that available to company — essential element of defence vested in or exercisable by company – whether claim is subject of arbitration agreement — whether agreement inoperative by abandonment. Legislation Cited: Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW) ss 2, 8, 16 UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration art 16(1) Cases Cited: ACD Tridon v Tridon Australia [2022] NSWSC 896 Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australia Shipping Pty Ltd (2006) 157 FCR 45; [2006] FCAFC 192 Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394; [1990] HCA 39 DFD Rhodes Pty Ltd v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd [2022] WASCA 97 Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd v Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2017] 3 SLR 267; [2016] SHJC 238 Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 514; [2019] HCA 13 Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd v Rinehart (2017) 257 FCR 442; [2017] FCAFC 170 John Holland v Kellog Brown & Root [2015] NSWSC 451 Khoury v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1983) 165 CLR 622; [1984] HCA 55 La Donna Pty Ltd v Wolford AG [2005] VSC 359; (2005) 194 FLR 26 Lepcanfin Pty Ltd v Lepfin Pty Ltd (2020) 102 NSWLR 627; [2020] NSWCA 155 Michael Wilson & Partners v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Pipeline Services WA Pty Ltd v Atco Gas Australia Pty Ltd [2014] WASC 10 Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 634; [1974] HCA 40 Tanning Research Laboratories Inc v O'Brien [1990] HCA 8; (1990) 169 CLR 332 WCX M4-M5 Link AT Pty Ltd v Acciona Infrastructure Projects Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 505 WesTrac Pty Ltd v Eastcoast OTR Tyres Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 894; (2008) 219 FLR 461 Wilkie v Gordian Runoff Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 522; [2005] HCA 17 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: King River Digital Assets Opportunities SPC (Plaintiff) Matteo Salerno (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr O Jones (Plaintiff) Mr J Hutton SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate