NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Haines v R; Brown v R [2023] NSWCCA 108 Hearing dates: 6 March 2023 Date of orders: 17 May 2023 Decision date: 17 May 2023 Before: Ward P; Walton J; Davies J Decision: Application by Brown 1. Leave to appeal be granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Application by Haines 1. Leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against decision to refuse discharge of whole jury – Where individual juror discharged for misconduct at the commencement of the trial and applicants ultimately convicted by a jury of eleven CRIME – Appeals – From jury verdict – Misdirection or nondirection regarding CCTV evidence relating to identification Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6B Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 116, 165, 152, Pt 3.9 Jury Act 1977 (NSW), ss 19, 22, 53B, Pt 7A Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW), r 4.15 Cases Cited: ARS v R [2011] NSWCCA 266 Bulejcik v The Queen (1995-96) 185 CLR 375; [1996] HCA 50 Clark v R [2010] NSWCCA 94 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427; [1996] HCA 22 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555; [1992] HCA 13 Farrell v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 286; [1998] HCA 50 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 GAR v R (No 2) [2010] NSWCCA 164 Haile v R [2022] NSWCCA 71 Hamide v R (2019) 101 NSWLR 455; [2019] NSWCCA 219 Hamilton v R [2020] NSWCCA 80 Kalbasi v Western Australia (2018) 264 CLR 62; [2018] HCA 7 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79; [1989] HCA 60 Medich v R [2021] NSWCCA 36; (2021) 390 ALR 398 Mikael v R [2015] NSWCCA 294 Mortimer v R [2021] NSWCCA 47 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 Phan v R [2018] NSWCCA 225 Pratten v R [2021] NSWCCA 251 R v Baartman [2000] NSWCCA 298 R v Fowler [2003] NSWCCA 321; (2003) 151 A Crim R 166 R v Hunt [2003] NSWCCA 301 R v Papanicolaou (No 5) [2022] NSWSC 28 R v Sharpe (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 33 R v We (No 6) [2019] NSWSC 930 R v Wilson (2005) 62 NSWLR 346; [2005] NSWCCA 20 R v Wu (1998) 103 A Crim R 416 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Singh v DPP (NSW) [2006] NSWCCA 333; (2006) 164 A Crim R 284 TO v R [2017] NSWCCA 12; (2017) 265 A Crim R 191 Trieu v R [2012] NSWCCA 169 Watson v R [2022] NSWCCA 208 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300; [2005] HCA 81 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aaron Brown (Applicant) Tony Williams Haines (Applicant) The King (Crown) Representation: Counsel: G Wendler with M Juhasz (Applicants) E Balodis (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate