NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kochai v R [2023] NSWCCA 116 Hearing dates: 15 February 2023 Date of orders: 24 May 2023 Decision date: 24 May 2023 Before: Button J at [1]; Wilson J at [2]; N Adams J at [3]. Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – objective seriousness – whether sentencing judge made an assessment of objective seriousness – where sentencing judge noted factors relevant to finding – no requirement to use an adjective to assess objective seriousness – ground dismissed CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – manifest excess – where no specific error discerned – whether sentence was manifestly excessive having regard to degree of accumulation – where applicant traded cocaine for illegal cigarettes – trading illegal substances represents more significant criminality than trading an illegal substance for money - comparable cases distinguishable – ground dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193D(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A(3)(i) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5(1)(c), 6(3) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 10(1), 25(2) Cases Cited: A v R [2020] NSWCCA 145 Bektasovski v R [2022] NSWCCA 246 Briouzguine v R [2014] NSWCCA 264 Cahyadi v R (2007) 168 A Crim R 41; [2007] NSWCCA 1 Delaney v R; R v Delaney [2013] NSWCCA 150 DH v R [2022] NSWCCA 200 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 19 Faraj v R [2022] NSWCCA 31 Hadler v R [2020] NSWCCA 305 Hili v the Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Huang v R [2019] NSWCCA 144 Irmak v R; Dagdanasar v R [2021] NSWCCA 178 Khoury v R [2020] NSWCCA 190 Lee v R [2019] NSWCCA 106 McLean v R [2020] NSWCCA 344 Merheb v R [2021] NSWCCA 224 Naberezhnov v R [2021] NSWCCA 142 Newman (a pseudonym) v R [2019] NSWCCA 157 Nye v The Queen [2018] NSWCCA 244 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Parkinson v R [2021] NSWCCA 98 Pham v R [2014] NSWCCA 115 R v Andrew Lee Black; R v Rowan Alistair Connell [2019] NSWDC 756 R v Campbell [2014] NSWCCA 102 R v Chami; R v Hassoun; R v Halloum [2021] NSWDC 519 R v Kochai [2022] NSWDC 230 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 Rodgers v R [2018] NSWCCA 47 Rodriego (a Pseudonym) v The Queen (2021) 293 A Crim R 308; [2021] NSWCCA 237 Yeung v R [2018] NSWCCA 52 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Khalid Kochai (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Goodwin (Applicant) S Lind (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate