NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hanave Pty Ltd v Nomad Sydney Pty Ltd (formerly Wine Nomad Pty Ltd) (No. 2) [2023] NSWSC 533 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 19 May 2023 Decision date: 19 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Chen J Decision: Order 8 made on 24 March 2023 is varied to now read as follows: order the defendant to pay 95% of the plaintiff's costs of the proceeding in this Court. Catchwords: COSTS – apportionment of costs – whether the defendant bettered the terms in its Calderbank offer – whether apportionment should be made reflecting successes and failure of parties on particular issues Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Doppstadt Australia Pty Ltd v Lovick & Son Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 219 Hendriks v McGeoch (2008) Aust Torts Reports 81-942; [2008] NSWCA 53 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Monie v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 15 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Hanave Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Nomad Sydney Pty Ltd (formerly Wine Nomad Pty Ltd) (defendant) Representation: Counsel: J E Lazarus SC with M Sheldon and Y Truong (plaintiff) A Oakes (defendant)
Solicitors: Gilbert Mane Solicitors (plaintiff) Peterson Haines (defendant) File Number(s): 2022/153845 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate