NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Shah Friends Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 55 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 9 June 2023 Decision date: 09 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore J Decision: See order at [34] Catchwords: COSTS ‑ successful appeal pursuant to s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 ‑ appeal successful on the grounds not advanced before primary decision‑maker ‑ appeal grounds advanced and argued alleging error on behalf of the primary decision‑maker rejected ‑ majority of originally pleaded grounds abandoned ‑ ordered that there be no order for costs unless a party sought a variation to that position ‑ Applicant proposes variation to the effect that the Respondent pays the Applicant's costs of the appeal ‑ proposed variation to be dealt with on the basis of written submissions ‑ written submissions provided for Applicant and Respondent ‑ Applicant also provides "reply" submissions that advance a completely new basis without leave or notice ‑ written submissions (including "reply" submissions) considered ‑ no basis to depart from original costs determination - application to vary original costs determination dismissed ‑ no order sought for consideration of costs' variation application ‑ no order for the costs of the costs' variation application Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(1) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 56A Cases Cited: Community Association DP270253 v Woollahra Municipal Council [2015] NSWCA 80 Director‑General, Department of Planning and Infrastructure v Glass Recovery Services Pty Limited [2015] NSWLEC 49 Port Stephens Council v Jeffrey Sansom (2007) 156 LGERA 125; [2007] NSWCA 299 Shah Friends Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council [2023] NSWLEC 31 Thaina Town v Sydney (2007) 71 NSWLR 230; (2007) 156 LGERA 150 Category: Costs Parties: Shah Friends Pty Ltd (Applicant) Cumberland Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms A Pearman, barrister (Applicant) Ms N Hammond, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate