NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Denny v Optus Mobile Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 57 Hearing dates: Written submissions received on 6, 20 April 2023 Date of orders: 1 June 2023 Decision date: 01 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: See below in [17] Catchwords: COSTS – successful applicant in judicial review proceedings entitled to costs in absence of disentitling conduct – liability for costs of respondents who filed submitting appearance – consent authority liable to pay costs – beneficiary of development consent declared invalid not subject to costs order in circumstances of case Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 4.14 Gosford Local Environment Plan 2014 (NSW), cll 4.3 4.6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 1.5 42.1, Sch 1 Cases Cited: Brown v Randwick City Council (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 28 Cutcliffe v Lithgow City Council (2006) 147 LGERA 330; [2006] NSWLEC 463 Denny v Optus Mobile Pty Ltd [2023] NSWLEC 27 Lu v Walding (No 3) [2022] NSWLEC 15 Platford v van Veenendaal and Shoalhaven City Council (No 2) [2018] NSWLEC 86 Category: Costs Parties: Anthony Denny (First Applicant) Helena Denny (Second Applicant) Optus Mobile Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Central Coast Local Planning Panel (Second Respondent) Central Coast Council (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J McKelvey (First and Second Applicants) N Eastman (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate