NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: GJA Kalra Pty Ltd v Amgade Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 119 Hearing dates: 15 November 2022 Date of orders: 15 November 2022 Decision date: 15 November 2022 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Brereton JA at [4]; Griffiths AJA at [9] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs Catchwords: ESTOPPEL – promissory estoppel – detrimental reliance – estoppel asserted to preclude lessors from enforcing rights under a lease of premises – where estoppel said to run with the land – no detrimental reliance shown – appeal conceded Cases Cited: Hamilton v Geraghty (1901) 1 SR (NSW) Eq 81; (1901) 18 WN (NSW) 152 Hill v AWJ Moore & Co (1990) 5 BPR 11,359 Plimmer v Wellington Corporation (1884) 9 App Cas 699 Vinden v Vinden [1982] 1 NSWLR 618 Ward v Kirkland [1966] 1 All ER 609; [1967] Ch 194 Category: Principal judgment Parties: GJA Kalra Pty Ltd (Appellant) Amgade Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Todarello Property Investments Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Green SC with J Mack (Appellant) P Afshar (Respondents)
Solicitors: Felicio Law Firm (Appellant) KB Legals (Respondents) File Number(s): 2022/151836 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Equity Division Citation: [2022] NSWSC 509 Date of Decision: 29 April 2022 Before: Peden J File Number(s): 2019/198412
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate