NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mayhew v Gittany [2023] NSWCATAP 156 Hearing dates: 29 May 2023 Date of orders: 13 June 2023 Decision date: 13 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M A Harrowell, Deputy President G Blake AM SC, Senior Member Decision: Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CONTRACT LAW – obligations of supplier where advice concerning construction method and location of structure not accepted CONSUMER LAW - obligations to provide services with due care and skill and to ensure services are fit for purpose or of a quality, state or condition that might reasonably be expected to achieve a required result - consumer not relying on skill or judgement of the supplier Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 80 Australian Consumer Law (NSW), ss 60, 61 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stuart F Mayhew (Appellant) Marcel Gittany (First Respondent) Anne Gittany (Second Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self Represented) Respondents (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2023/00092383 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 28 February 2023 Before: D Ash, General Member File Number(s): GEN 22/52771
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate