NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clermont Residences Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2023] NSWLEC 1293 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 2 June 2023 Date of orders: 14 June 2023 Decision date: 14 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: The orders of the Court are: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development Consent No. 177/2020, as modified, is further modified by Modification Application No. 177/2020/3, subject to the consolidated conditions of consent at Annexure A. Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.55, 8.9 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 113 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Clermont Residences Pty Ltd (Applicant) Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Boskovitz (Solicitor) (Applicant) C Patterson (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Boskovitz Lawyers (Applicant) Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/329099 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Modification Application No. 177/2020/3 to modify Development Consent No. 177/2020, as previously modified (the proposal), at 132 Bellevue Road, Bellevue Hill (the site) by Woollahra Municipal Council (the Council). 2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 2 June 2023. I presided over the conciliation conference. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. 3. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision if the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties' decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.55(2) of the EPA Act to modify the development consent. 4. There are preconditions to the exercise of power to modify the development consent.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate