NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nahata v Robertson [2023] NSWSC 642 Hearing dates: 23 – 24 May 2023 Decision date: 15 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Real Property List Before: Peden J Decision: Plaintiffs' Amended Statement of Claim is dismissed: see [142] Catchwords: LAND LAW — Easements — Creation of easements — Creation by order of court — Where plaintiffs seeking stormwater drainage easement to facilitate residential development — Whether easement reasonably necessary for development — Whether there is sufficient evidence to determine question of reasonable necessity — Where easement not identified with precision — Where no easement imposed — Where question of compensation does not arise LAND LAW — Easements — Whether reasonable attempts made to obtain the easement or an easement having the same effect — Where alternative easement traversed other properties — Where limited evidence of correspondence with other owners — Where uncertainties associated with proposed easement ignored — Where uncertainties related to impact on retaining wall — Where reasonable attempts not made to obtain the easement Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) ss 88(1), 88K Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 53, 91 Cases Cited: 117 York Street Pty Ltd v Proprietors of Strata Plan No 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504 Coles Myer NSW Ltd v Dymocks Book Arcade Ltd (1996) 7 BPR 14,638 Gordon v Lever (2018) 97 NSWLR 90 Govindan-Lee v Sawkins [2016] NSWSC 328 Khattar v Wiese [2005] NSWSC 1014 McGrath v Mestousis [2017] NSWSC 995 Mitchell v Boutagy [2001] NSWSC 1045 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 445 Rainbowforce Pty Ltd v Skyton Holdings Pty Ltd [2010] NSWLEC 2 Smith v Woodley-Beattie [2009] NSWSC 380 Sodhi v Stanes [2007] NSWSC 177 Stepanoski v Chen [2011] NSWSC 1573 Studholme v Rawson (2020) 102 NSWLR 490 Tregoyd Gardens Pty Ltd v Jervis (1997) 8 BPR 15,845 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Himanshu Nahata (First Plaintiff) Priyanka Jain (Second Plaintiff) Russell Robertson (First Defendant) Stana Robertson (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Lee, solicitor (Plaintiffs) J Rogers (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate