NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Salama v R [2023] NSWCCA 141 Hearing dates: 28 April 2023 Decision date: 21 June 2023 Before: Wright J at [1] Wilson J at [2] Fagan J at [60] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted; (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – offences of possessing a precursor intending it to be used in the manufacture of prohibited drug – other offences taken into account on sentence – joint sentence hearing of co-offenders at first instance – question of the use made by sentencing judge of evidentiary material relevant only to a co-offender – whether error in assessment of objective gravity Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 148 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 33 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 24A(1)(a), 25(1) Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901 (NSW), s 4(1)(B) Cases Cited: Decision Restricted [2023] NSWCCA 10 Elias v R; Issa v R (2013) 248 CLR 483; [2013] HCA 31 Higgins v R [2020] NSWCCA 169 JG v R [2023] NSWCCA 33 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Martellotta v R [2021] NSWCCA 168 McDowall v R [2019] NSWCCA 29 Thorp v R [2022] NSWCCA 180 Unity Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCCA 266 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Salama (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I McLachlan (Applicant) M Swift (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate