NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Jouda [2023] NSWCATOD 83 Hearing dates: 24 February 2023 Date of orders: 19 June 2023 Decision date: 19 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: I Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member Dr J Fogarty, Senior Member Dr C Newberry, Senior Member S Lovrovich, General Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 149C(4)(a) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), the Tribunal would have cancelled the Respondent's registration if he were still registered as a medical practitioner. (2) Pursuant to s 149C(4)(b) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), the Tribunal orders that the Respondent is disqualified from being registered as a medical practitioner for a period of 12 months from the date of this decision. (3) Pursuant to s 149A(1)(a) of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), the Respondent is reprimanded. (4) A party seeking an order for costs file and serve written submissions not exceeding 7 pages in length within 28 days of the date of this decision. (5) A party opposing an order for costs file and serve written submissions not exceeding 7 pages in length within 56 days of the date of this decision. (6) A party opposing an order pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) dispensing with a hearing of any costs application include in any submissions filed pursuant to these orders submissions in opposition to such course. Catchwords: OCCUPATONS – medical practitioners – misconduct and discipline – unprofessional conduct and professional misconduct – protective orders Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 50(2) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), ss 3, 3A, 4, 149A-149C Cases Cited: Chatoor v Health Care Complaints Commission of NSW [2020] NSWCA 111 Chen v Health Care Complaints Commission (2017) 95 NSWLR 334; [2017] NSWCA 186 Crickitt v Medical Council of NSW (No 2) [2015] NSWCATOD 115 Dawson v Law Society of New South Wales [1989] NSWCA 58 Director-General, Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care v Lambert (2009) 74 NSWLR 523; [2009] NSWCA 102 Gad v Health Care Complaints Commission [2002] NSWCA 111 Ghosh v Medical Council of New South Wales (2020) 102 NSWLR 303; [2020] NSWCA 122 Health Care Complaints Commission v Buys (No 3) [2020] NSWCATOD 102 Health Care Complaints Commission v Cahoud [2022] NSWCATOD 36 Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Duggan [2015] NSWCATOD 142 Health Care Complaints Commission v Jangodz [2016] NSWCATOD 71 Health Care Complaints Commission v Jouda [2022] NSWCATOD 56 Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield (1997) 41 NSWLR 630; [1997] NSWSC 29 Health Care Complaints Commission v Luque [2019] NSWCATOD 129 Health Care Complaints Commission v Schmaman [2019] NSWCATOD 82 Lee v Health Care Complaints Commission [2012] NSWCA 80 Lindsay v Health Care Complaints Commission [2005] NSWCA 356 Sabag v Health Care Complaints Commission [2001] NSWCA 411 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Dr Dheyaa Kadhim Jouda (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Chatterjee (Applicant) M Hutchings (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate