NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Mark Stevens (a pseudonym) under Part 7 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2023] NSWSC 657 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 June 2023 Decision date: 16 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Weinstein J Decision: The application of Mark Stevens filed on 3 August 2022 pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal and review – application to Supreme Court for inquiry under Part 7 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 into five convictions of indecent assault of person under 16 – defended hearing in the Local Court – whether there were errors made by the applicant's lawyer or the Magistrate - whether there is an appearance of a doubt or question as to the guilt of the applicant – no doubt or question - application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Application by AZ for inquiry into conviction pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes Appeal and Review Act 2001 (NSW) [2020] NSWSC 1048 Application of Peter James Holland under s. 78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales (2015) 324 ALR 562; [2015] NSWCA 221 GAR v Attorney General of New South Wales (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 314 Gibson, Scott – Application under Part 7 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2022] NSWSC 1577 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 Varley v Attorney-General (NSW) (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Williams v R [2021] NSWCCA 25 Texts Cited: Criminal Trials Bench Book Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Stevens (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Attorney General of New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Applicant: self-represented Respondent: S McGee (instructed by the Crown Solicitor's Office) File Number(s): 2022/13723 Publication restriction: Non-publication order with respect to the name of the complainant or any information which may tend to identify them.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate