NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ritchie v R [2023] NSWCCA 153 Hearing dates: 12 April 2023 Date of orders: 23 June 2023 Decision date: 23 June 2023 Before: Adamson JA at [1] McNaughton J at [20] Sweeney J at [22] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal 2. Allow the appeal 3. Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court and in lieu thereof, sentence the Applicant to a non-parole period of 3 years imprisonment commencing on 31 December 2020, with an additional term of 2 years imprisonment, making a total sentence of 5 years imprisonment. The non-parole period will expire on 30 December 2023. The sentence will expire on 30 December 2025. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — wound with intent to cause grievous bodily harm — manifest excess — parity — Bugmy principles — mental illness — appeal allowed — Applicant resentenced Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 27 C v R [2022] NSWCCA 285 Carr v R [2014] NSWCCA 202 Chamon v R [2020] NSWCCA 112 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 DS v R [2014] NSWCCA 267 England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 Er v R [2018] NSWCCA 286 Estephan v R [2015] NSWCCA 100 Gill v R [2010] NSWCCA 236 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Jimmy v R (2010) 77 NSWLR 540; [2010] NSWCCA 60 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Kitson v R [2022] NSWCCA 166 Lewis v R [2021] NSWCCA 108 Li v R [2021] NSWCCA 75; (2022) 400 ALR 578 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Miles v R [2017] NSWCCA 266 Pham v R [2009] NSWCCA 25; (2009) 193 A Crim R 190 Sadiq v R [2023] NSWCCA 25 Tatana v R [2006] NSWCCA 398 Tsimingos v R [2021] NSWCCA 107 Wat v R [2017] NSWCCA 62 Z v R [2022] NSWCCA 286 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Matthew Ritchie (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Mulligan (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate