One T Development Pty Ltd v Peter Krejci in his capacity as liquidator of ENA Development Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 136

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: One T Development Pty Ltd v Peter Krejci in his capacity as liquidator of ENA Development Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 136 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 20 June 2023 Before: Ward P; Leeming JA; Mitchelmore JA Decision: Application to vary order 1 made on 2 June 2023 refused. Catchwords: PRACTICE – application to vary costs order – no basis for variation made out Cases Cited: One T Development Pty Ltd v Peter Krejci in his capacity as liquidator of ENA Development Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 120 Category: Costs Parties: One T Development Pty Ltd (Appellant) Peter Krejci in his capacity liquidator of ENA Development Pty Ltd (First Respondent) ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liq) (Second Respondent) Andy Pham (Third Respondent) Thi Pham (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Jemmott (Appellant)

Solicitors: Sydney Law Practice (Appellant) File Number(s): 2022/223074 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Equity Division – Corporations List Citation: [2022] NSWSC 919 Date of Decision: 11 July 2022 Before: Stevenson J File Number(s): 2022/32115

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]