NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: UMA Centre Limited v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2023] NSWLEC 1322 Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference 16 May and 8 June 2023 Date of orders: 22 June 2023 Decision date: 22 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Espinosa C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development Consent No. DA-893/2020 is modified in the terms in Annexure A. (3) Development Consent No. DA-893/2020 as modified by the Court is Annexure B. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL – modification of consent with new operational plan of management – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – costs sought by the Respondent – orders Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.55, 8.15 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 113 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007, rr 3.7, 3.10 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Pt 42, r 42.1, Sch 1 Cases Cited: Ghazi Al Ali Architect Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2022] NSWLEC 1493 Category: Principal judgment Parties: UMA Centre Limited (Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Conomos (Solicitor) (Applicant) M Bonanno (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Conomos Legal (Applicant) Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 22/382066 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate