NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Narellan Franchise Pty Ltd v RBME Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 139 Hearing dates: 20 June 2023 Decision date: 23 June 2023 Before: Ward P; Leeming JA; Kirk JA Decision: In 2022/381924 1. Notice of appeal filed on 22 February 2023 dismissed as incompetent. 2. The appellants to pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings in this Court. In 2023/198235 1. Summons seeking leave to appeal dated 20 June 2023 dismissed. 2. The appellants to pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings in this Court. Catchwords: APPEALS – leave to appeal – whether decision is interlocutory – where final injunctions refused after a three day hearing but pecuniary claims remained undetermined – where because of passage of time, no injunction would be ordered even if grounds were made out – appellants belatedly asked for determination of questions of construction which were not determined by primary judge – absence of full submissions on construction at first instance and on appeal – desirability of questions of construction being answered in light of findings of fact – ability to appeal after determination of unresolved issues – leave refused Legislation Cited: Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW), s 4 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 101(2)(e), 103 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 36.16 Cases Cited: Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) (1981) 147 CLR 246; [1981] HCA 20 Cassaniti v Katavic (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 107 Computer Edge Pty Ltd v Apple Computer Inc [1984] HCA 47; (1984) 54 ALR 767 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton (2012) 246 CLR 498; [2012] HCA 7 Health Care Complaints Commission v Robinson [2022] NSWCA 164 Libra Collaroy Pty Ltd v Bhide [2017] NSWCA 196 Licul v Corney (1976) 180 CLR 213; [1976] HCA 6 Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Narellan Franchise Pty Ltd v RBME Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 988 Narellan Franchise Pty Ltd v RBME Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1590 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Narellan Franchise Pty Ltd (First Appellant/Applicant) Narellan Pools Pty Ltd (Second Appellant/Applicant) RBME Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Tim Ranieri (Second Respondent) Matthew John Ranieri (Third Respondent) T&M Pools Pty Ltd (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: PM Knowles SC and J Douglas (Appellants/Applicants) A Fernon SC and N Kirby (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate