NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners – Strata Plan No 61618 v JPG Investment Holdings Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATAP 167 Hearing dates: 7 June 2023 Date of orders: 23 June 2023 Decision date: 23 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Suthers, Principal Member Decision: (1) In respect of the decision made on 12 May 2023 in matter number SC 22/26211, the operation of orders 1 & 2 is stayed pending further order or finalisation of the appeal, whichever is the earlier in time. This order is conditional upon the appellant, by motion passed at a general meeting, ratifying or having ratified the decision to lodge the appeal. (2) The costs of the application for a stay will be the appellant's costs in the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – Application for a Stay of order requiring Owners Corporation to consent to development application Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (NSW) Cases Cited: Beck v Colonial Staff Super Pty Ltd & Ors (No. 2) [2015] NSWSC 1360 Bentran v Sabbarton [2014] NSWCATAP 37 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26 Hickie v Land and Enviro Corp Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 472 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 489 Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 737; [2002] NSWCA 383 Mars City Pty Ltd v Burwood Council [2020] NSWLEC 1585 New South Wales Bar Association v Stevens [2003] NSWCA 95 Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd v Lesvos Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 103 Rose Bay Afloat Pty Ltd v Woolahra Council & Anor [2002] NSWLEC 208 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) Vaughan v Dawson [2008] NSWCA 169 Wharf 11 Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (unreported 15 February 1991) Yolarno Pty Ltd v Shandong Delisi Food Co Ltd [2022] NSWCA 30 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The Owners – Strata Plan No 61618 (Appellant) JPG Investment Holdings Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Conrad Corporation Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate