NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 698 Hearing dates: 19 June 2023 Date of orders: 23 June 2023 Decision date: 23 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Williams J Decision: See paragraph [51]. Catchwords: PLEADINGS — summary dismissal — striking out — whether claims are so obviously untenable that they cannot succeed — whether no reasonable cause of action disclosed — whether embarrassing — no question of principle. Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, ss 2, 18, 20, 236 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 500(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 14.28 Cases Cited: Banque Commerciale SA (En Liquidation) v Akhil Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279; (1990) 64 ALJR 244; (1990) 92 ALR 53; [1990] HCA 11 Berry v CCL Secure Pty Ltd (2020) 271 CLR 151; (2020) 94 ALJR 715; (2020) 381 ALR 427; [2020] HCA 27 DSHE Holdings Ltd (Receivers and Managers) (in liq) v Potts; HSBC Bank Ltd v Abboud; Potts v National Australia Bank Ltd (2022) 371 FLR 349; [2022] NSWCA 165 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; (1964) 38 ALJR 253; [1965] ALR 636; [1964] HCA 69 Lucantonio v Benscrape Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 579 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Limited (2010) 241 CLR 357; (2010) 84 ALJR 644; (2010) 270 ALR 204; (2010) 16 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-862; [2010] ATPR 42-325; [2010] HCA 31 OXS Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2016] NSWCA 120 Nitopi v Nitopi (2022) 109 NSWLR 390; (2022) 405 ALR 470; [2022] NSWCA 162 Traderight (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bank of Queensland Ltd [2015] NSWCA 94 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Taliberry Entertainment Pty Ltd (ACN 625 236 348) (Plaintiff) Cyber Entertainment Pty Ltd (ACN 160 448 395) (First Defendant) Harris John Meitanis (Second Defendant) APE Events Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 098 395 263) (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Klineberg (Plaintiff) Mr M Kalyk (First and Second Defendant) Third Defendant did not appear
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate