NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Infinity Security Group Pty Limited v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2023] NSWCATAP 173 Hearing dates: 24 March 2023 Date of orders: 28 June 2023 Decision date: 28 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: I R Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: 1 Leave to appeal is refused. 2 A party seeking an order for costs file and serve written submissions not exceeding 5 pages in length in support of such application within 21 days of this decision. 3 A party opposing an order for costs file and serve written submissions not exceeding 5 pages in length in support of such opposition within 42 days of this decision. 4 A party opposing an order dispensing with a hearing of any costs application pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 include submissions in support of such opposition in any submissions filed pursuant to these orders. Catchwords: APPEAL- whether leave should be granted to appeal against interlocutory orders made under s 59 of Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997, s 49 and s 64 of Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act in administrative review proceedings under Security Industry Act - whether leave to adduce new evidence should be granted Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Courts Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Migration Act 1960 (Cth) Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bellamy v Bellamy [2018] NSWSC 354 Bettington v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAP 110 Brazel v Sydney Water [2022] NSWCATAP 180 Champion Homes Pty Limited v Guirgis [2018] NSWCATAP 54 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Commissioner of Police, New South Wales v Gray (2009) 74 NSWLR 1 Dattilo v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 349 DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2020] NSWCA 136 Grant v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 158 HT v The Queen (2019) 269 CLR 403; [2019] HCA 40 Magdy and Infinity Security Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2022] NSWCATOD 172 Pendrick v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2021] NSWCATAD 326 Pollard v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2021] NSWCATAP 227 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Association (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Public Service Association & Professional Officers Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales v Secretary of the Treasury [2014] NSWCA 112 27 Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane (1987) 162 CLR 514; [1987] HCA 12 Ros v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 70 State of New South Wales (Justice Health)v Dezfouli [2008] NSWADTAP 27 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 229 CLR 152; [2006] HCA 63 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362; [2017] HCA 34 Ultimate Vision Investments Pty Limited v Innovation and Science Australia [2023] FCAFC 23 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Infinity Security Group Pty Ltd; Mehedat Magdy (Appellants) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G A Edwards (Appellants) T Liu (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate