NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Thomas v Aplitt & Anor [2023] NSWSC 727 Hearing dates: 8 June 2023 Date of orders: 28 June 2023 Decision date: 28 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: See [106] Catchwords: PROCEDURE — Separate question — Oral application for determination of separate question relating to revocation of grant of Probate and a grant of letters of administration with the copy Will annexed to the Plaintiff — Whether suitable for separate determination — No dispute that the order for the hearing of the separate question should be made — Separate question ordered and determined SUCCESSION — EXECUTORS — REMOVAL AND DISCHARGE — REVOCATION OF PROBATE - Parties are siblings — Where the two Defendants are the substitute executors of the Will of the deceased — Deceased died in 1997 — Probate granted in November 2000 — Where the only significant asset of the deceased was a residential property — Where the Will required the deceased's estate to be collected, debts, funeral, and testamentary expenses to be paid, and the balance of the estate to be divided equally between her 6 children — Where one of the Defendants resided in the real property until about 2019 — Plaintiff seeks revocation of grant of Probate and her appointment as administrator and other relief against executors — Lack of due and proper administration of the estate — First Defendant consents to order for revocation of Probate and appointment of the Plaintiff to complete the administration — Second Defendant not an active party in the proceedings and did not appear at the hearing — Revocation justified as executors failed to fully administer the estate — Order for revocation of grant, with fresh grant of letters of administration with copy Will annexed to the Plaintiff Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 78, r 49 Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), s 11 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 28.2 Cases Cited: Bramston v Morris (Supreme Court (NSW), Powell J, 20 August 1993, unrep) Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) v Livingston [1965] AC 694; [1964] UKPC 2 Crawley v Vero Insurance Ltd & Ors [2012] NSWSC 593 Dickman v Holley; Estate of Simpson [2013] NSWSC 18 Estate Kouvakas; Lucas v Konakas [2014] NSWSC 786 Estate of Philip Mack (Deceased) [2022] NSWSC 1629 Gertsch v Roberts; The Estate of Gertsch (1993) 35 NSWLR 631 Gorman v McGuire: Estate of J.M. Gorman [2002] NSWSC 1089 In re Gillard deceased [1949] VicLawRp 22; [1949] VLR 378 In the Goods of Loveday [1900] P 154 In the matter of Central Management (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liquidation) ACN 139 989 852 [2017] NSWSC 1258 Livingston v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) (1960) 107 CLR 411; [1960] HCA 94 Nobarani v Mariconte (2018) 265 CLR 236; [2018] HCA 36 Riccardi v Riccardi [2013] NSWSC 1655 Sandra Elizabeth Lester v Terrence Myles Brown [2022] NSWSC 716 Southwell v Bennett [2010] NSWSC 1372 The Estate of Erminia Agnes Rogers v Rogers [2009] WASC 358 Tsaknis as Executor and Trustee of the Estate of Geoffrey Douglas Roland Lilburne (Dec) v Lilburne [2010] WASC 152 Watson v Hannover Life Re of Australasia Limited [2018] NSWSC 877 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Janice Millicent Thomas (Plaintiff) Jeffrey Arthur Aplitt (first Defendant) James Robert Keith Aplitt (second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Glover (Plaintiff) F F F Salama (first Defendant) No appearance (second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate