NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ganghui Pty Ltd v YTO Construction Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 729 Hearing dates: 26 – 28 April, 1, 8 – 9, 11 May 2023; further written submissions 20 and 22 June 2023 Date of orders: 28 June 2023 Decision date: 28 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Developer's claim under handwritten agreement succeeds; developer's final payment certificate not effective; builder's claim under s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law fails; builder's claim for $600,000 loan fails; builder's claim for variations fails Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – multi-storey residential development – dispute between developer and builder – whether there was an "arrangement" or "further arrangement" outside the contract – whether developer engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct – developer's claim under "handwritten agreement" – whether developer's final payment certificate effective – whether director of developer appointed as developer's principal's representative – purported variations – whether work in question was within scope of works under the contract EVIDENCE – witness evidence – interpreter – where interpreter reported that plaintiff's director's translator had advised director as to the evidence he should give in their native tongue during court adjournment – whether such conduct is established Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Bucknell v Commercial Banking Company of Sydney Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 155; [1937] HCA 35 Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82; [1984] FCA 180 Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560; [2019] HCA 32 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221; [1987] HCA 5 Piggott v Townsend [1926] 27 SR(NSW) 25 Robins v Goddard [1905] 1 KB 294 YTO Construction Pty Ltd v Innovative Civil Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1354 YTO Construction Pty Ltd v Innovative Civil Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 110 Texts Cited: Keith Mason, Mason & Carter's Restitution Law in Australia (4th ed, 2021, LexisNexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ganghui Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Fu Ming Guo (Second Cross-Defendant) YTO Construction Pty Ltd (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: M Christie SC with B Ilkovski (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendants) F Corsaro SC (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate