NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Alahmad [2023] NSWSC 762 Hearing dates: 03 July 2023 Date of orders: 03 July 2023 Decision date: 03 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Summons dismissed. (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – Appeal from Local Court to Supreme Court – Where defendant issued subpoena to Commissioner of Police – Magistrate declined application by Commissioner to set aside subpoena – Commissioner sought leave to appeal pursuant to s 53(3)(a) of Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 –Section 53 provides avenue of appeal to defendants only, not third parties – No jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal – Summons dismissed STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001, s 53(3)(a) – Whether s 53(3)(a) provides avenue of appeal to third party subpoena recipient – Meaning of "any person" – Purpose, context and history of provision considered – Commissioner of Police v Chidgey followed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Interpretation Act 1987 Justices Act 1902 Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police v Chidgey & Anor [2007] NSWSC 417 Jolley v DPP [2020] NSWSC 1406 Paulo v Commissioner for Police [2021] NSWSC 517 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of Police (P) Assad Alahmad (D) Representation: Counsel: J Emmett SC / J Brook (P) J Lang (D)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate