NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hung v R [2023] NSWCCA 172 Hearing dates: 1 May 2023 Decision date: 10 July 2023 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Rothman J at [38]; McNaughton J at [39] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – appeal against sentence – parity – whether justifiable sense of grievance by reason of sentence imposed on co-offender – whether same total sentences imposed on applicant and co-offender justified Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 33 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(2) Cases Cited: C v R [2022] NSWCCA 285 Fenech v R [2018] NSWCCA 160 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Labban v R [2022] NSWCCA 275 Miles v The Queen [2017] NSWCCA 266 R v Achurch [2011] NSWCCA 186; 216 A Crim R 152 Weiss v R [2020] NSWCCA 188 Z v R [2022] NSWCCA 286 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mai Van Hung (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
T Ramrakha (Applicant) M Swift (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Office of the DPP (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00077449 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 9 June 2022 Before: Buscombe DCJ File Number(s): 2021/00077449
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate