NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lioncrest Capital Holdings Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2023] NSWLEC 1356 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 9 June 2023 Date of orders: 11 July 2023 Decision date: 11 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development Application No. DA2021/0478, which seeks consent for the demolition of existing dwellings and ancillary structures and construction of a five-storey residential flat building over basement parking at 6-10 Torrens Street, Blakehurst, is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 50 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 37 Georges Local Environmental Plan 2021, cll 2.3, 2,7, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.9, 6.10, 6.11. 6.12 Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No 2 (Georges River Catchment) 1999 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 Chs 2, 11 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy No. 65 - Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development 2000, cll 28, 30 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6 State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017, cl 6 Texts Cited: Georges River Community Engagement Plan 2017 Georges River Development Control Plan 2021 NSW Department of Planning and Environment, Apartment Design Guide, 2015 Standards Australia, Australian Standard AS 2601-2001: The Demolition of Structures, 2001 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lioncrest Capital Holdings Pty Limited (Applicant) Georges River Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Whealy (Solicitor) (Applicant) J Hewitt (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate